| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 99 | |
| 2. |  | INIA TREINTA Y TRES. Cultivos de Verano. Unidad Experimental Palo a Pique. Treinta y Tres (Uruguay): INIA, 2006. 34 p. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 461) Trabajos que se realizan en en el marco de las Rotaciones Agrícolas-Ganaderas de la UEPP lideradas por los Ing. Agr. PhD, José Terra y Álvaro Roel y el Ing. Agr. Ricardo Macedo.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|    |
| 7. | | INIA TREINTA Y TRES. Ensilaje de grano húmedo de sorgo. Jornada de divulgación. Treinta y Tres (Uruguay): INIA, 2010. 34 p. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión ; 604) Programa Nacional de Lecheria: Ing.Agr. MSc. Yamandú Acosta; Programa Nacional de Carne y Lana: Ing.Agr. MSc. Pablo Rovira, Ing.Agr. José I. Velazco; Unidad de Comunicación y Transferencia de Tecnología: Ing.Agr. MSc. Horacio Saravia| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 9. | | INIA TREINTA Y TRES Jornada anual de Producción Arroz - Ganadería (UPAG). Resultados 2008-2009. Treinta y Tres (Uruguay): INIA, 2009. 80 p. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 570) UNIDAD DE PRODUCCIÓN ARROZ-GANADERÍA (UPAG), UNIDAD EXPERIMENTAL PASO DE LA LAGUNA. Comisión UPAG-INIA: Téc. Rural Oscar Bonilla, Ing. Agr. M.Sc. Enrique Deambrosi, Ing. Agr. Guillermina Cantou, Ing.Agr. Ph.D José Terra, Ing. Agr. Dr....| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 10. | | INIA TREINTA Y TRES Jornada de divulgación de Producción Animal - Pasturas Treinta y Tres (Uruguay): INIA, 2009. 95 p. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión ; 591) Programa Nacional Pasturas y Forrajes: Ing. Agr., PhD. Walter Ayala, Director de Programa, Ing. Agr., MPhil. Raúl Bermúdez, Ing. Agr., MSc. Virginia Pravia, Lic., MSc. Felipe Lezama,
Téc. en Sistemas Intensivos de Prod.Animal Ethel...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 11. | | INIA TREINTA Y TRES Jornada de divulgación de la Unidad Experimental Palo a Pique Treinta y Tres (Uruguay): INIA, 2007. 48 p. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión ; 511) Programa Nacional Pasturas y Forrajes: Ing. Agr., PhD. Walter Ayala-Director de Programa, Ing. Agr., MPhil. Raúl Bermúdez, Ing. Agr. Virginia Pravia, Téc. en Sistemas Intensivos de Prod.Animal Ethel Barrios; Programa Nacional Producción...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 12. | | INIA TREINTA Y TRES. Pasturas: Sitio Experimental "El Solar". Guía de campo, 16 de setiembre, 2005. Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2005. 9 p. Convenio INIA-Intendencia Municipal de Maldonado. Técnicos participantes: Raúl Bermúdez, Walter Ayala, Santiago Barreto, Paola Ávila, Roberto Pereira, Virginia San Martín.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 13. | | INIA TREINTA Y TRES Sistematización del terreno. REUNIÓN TÉCNICA, 4-5 DICIEMBRE DE 1990, TREINTA Y TRES, URUGUAY. Treinta y Tres (Uruguay): INIA, 1990. Paginación irregular Proyecto Arroz IICA/BID/PROCISUR| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 99 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
16/10/2018 |
|
Actualizado : |
11/02/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
BORGES, A.; GONZÁLEZ-REYMUNDEZ, A.; ERNST, O.; CADENAZZI, M.; TERRA, J.A.; GUTIÉRREZ, L. |
|
Afiliación : |
ALEJANDRA BORGES, Departamento de Estadística. Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; AGUSTÍN GONZÁLEZ-REYMUNDEZ, Departamento de Estadística. Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; OSVALDO, ERNST, Departamento de Producción de Cultivos. EEMAC, Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; MÓNICA CADENAZZI, Departamento de Estadística. Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LUCÍA GUTIÉRREZ, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin. |
|
Título : |
Can spatial modeling substitute experimental design in agricultural experiments? |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Crop Science, 2018, v. 59, no. 1, p. 1-10. |
|
DOI : |
10.2135/cropsci2018.03.0177 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Accepted paper, posted 10/05/18. Published online December, 13. 2018. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
One of the most critical aspects of agricultural experimentation is the proper choice of experimental design to control field heterogeneity, especially for large experiments. However, even with complex experimental designs, spatial variability may not be properly controlled if it occurs at scales smaller than blocks. Therefore, modeling spatial variability can be beneficial and some studies even propose spatial modeling instead of experimental design. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of experimental design, spatial modeling, and a combination of both under real field conditions using GIS and simulating experiments. Yield data from cultivars was simulated using real spatial variability from a large uniformity trial of one hundred independent locations and different sizes of experiments for four experimental designs: completely randomized design (CRD), randomized complete block design (RCBD), alpha-lattice incomplete block design (ALPHA), and partially replicated design (PREP). Each realization was analyzed using different levels of spatial correction. Models were compared by precision, accuracy, and the recovery of superior genotypes. For moderate and large experiment sizes, ALPHA was the best experimental design in terms of precision and accuracy. In most situations, models that included spatial correlation were better than models with no spatial correlation but they did not outperformed better experimental designs. Therefore, spatial modeling is not a substitute for good experimental design. MenosAbstract:
One of the most critical aspects of agricultural experimentation is the proper choice of experimental design to control field heterogeneity, especially for large experiments. However, even with complex experimental designs, spatial variability may not be properly controlled if it occurs at scales smaller than blocks. Therefore, modeling spatial variability can be beneficial and some studies even propose spatial modeling instead of experimental design. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of experimental design, spatial modeling, and a combination of both under real field conditions using GIS and simulating experiments. Yield data from cultivars was simulated using real spatial variability from a large uniformity trial of one hundred independent locations and different sizes of experiments for four experimental designs: completely randomized design (CRD), randomized complete block design (RCBD), alpha-lattice incomplete block design (ALPHA), and partially replicated design (PREP). Each realization was analyzed using different levels of spatial correction. Models were compared by precision, accuracy, and the recovery of superior genotypes. For moderate and large experiment sizes, ALPHA was the best experimental design in terms of precision and accuracy. In most situations, models that included spatial correlation were better than models with no spatial correlation but they did not outperformed better experimental designs. Therefore, spatial modeling is not a substitut... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
EFFICIENCY STATISTICS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FIELD VARIABILITY; SPATIAL MODELS; UNIFORMITY TRIAL. |
|
Thesagro : |
DISENO ESTADISTICO; DISENO EXPERIMENTAL; MODELOS ESTADISTICOS; VARIABILIDAD. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
U30 Métodos de investigación |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02512naa a2200313 a 4500
001 1059193
005 2019-02-11
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.2135/cropsci2018.03.0177$2DOI
100 1 $aBORGES, A.
245 $aCan spatial modeling substitute experimental design in agricultural experiments?$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
500 $aArticle history: Accepted paper, posted 10/05/18. Published online December, 13. 2018.
520 $aAbstract: One of the most critical aspects of agricultural experimentation is the proper choice of experimental design to control field heterogeneity, especially for large experiments. However, even with complex experimental designs, spatial variability may not be properly controlled if it occurs at scales smaller than blocks. Therefore, modeling spatial variability can be beneficial and some studies even propose spatial modeling instead of experimental design. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of experimental design, spatial modeling, and a combination of both under real field conditions using GIS and simulating experiments. Yield data from cultivars was simulated using real spatial variability from a large uniformity trial of one hundred independent locations and different sizes of experiments for four experimental designs: completely randomized design (CRD), randomized complete block design (RCBD), alpha-lattice incomplete block design (ALPHA), and partially replicated design (PREP). Each realization was analyzed using different levels of spatial correction. Models were compared by precision, accuracy, and the recovery of superior genotypes. For moderate and large experiment sizes, ALPHA was the best experimental design in terms of precision and accuracy. In most situations, models that included spatial correlation were better than models with no spatial correlation but they did not outperformed better experimental designs. Therefore, spatial modeling is not a substitute for good experimental design.
650 $aDISENO ESTADISTICO
650 $aDISENO EXPERIMENTAL
650 $aMODELOS ESTADISTICOS
650 $aVARIABILIDAD
653 $aEFFICIENCY STATISTICS
653 $aEXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
653 $aFIELD VARIABILITY
653 $aSPATIAL MODELS
653 $aUNIFORMITY TRIAL
700 1 $aGONZÁLEZ-REYMUNDEZ, A.
700 1 $aERNST, O.
700 1 $aCADENAZZI, M.
700 1 $aTERRA, J.A.
700 1 $aGUTIÉRREZ, L.
773 $tCrop Science, 2018$gv. 59, no. 1, p. 1-10.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
